Re: new IRQ scalability changes in 2.3.48

From: Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Date: Wed Mar 01 2000 - 15:01:42 EST

On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> Nothing goes wrong. What happens without the IRQ_LEVEL bit is this:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ------------------ --------------------
> do_IRQ(27, ...)
> do_IRQ(27, ...)

Ok, horrible interrupt distribution hardware. Fair enough.

                Linus

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 21:00:26 EST