Bjoern> davidm@AZStarNet.com wrote:
>> the given cache sizes there are a lot of conflict misses.
>> Therefore, it would be interesting to see how the Noname would do
>> on a machine with a 1MB cache and/or with a 233MHz CPU (that CPU
>> also has the 16KB primary caches). Any takers?
Bjoern> Not exactly. The 233 MHz 21066A CPU has the same cache sizes
Bjoern> (8 + 8 kB) as the 21066. It has the faster division
Bjoern> algorithms of the 21064A though and a speedup greater than
Bjoern> the clock frequency ratio would be possible.
Oh, silly me. You're right. I confused the 21066A with the 21064A.
--david