Re: time_t size: The year 2038 bug?

From: Kai Henningsen (kaih@khms.westfalen.de)
Date: Thu Jan 06 2000 - 18:29:00 EST


wendling@ganymede.isdn.uiuc.edu (Bill Wendling) wrote on 05.01.00 in <20000105171300.E30086@ganymede.isdn.uiuc.edu>:

> My main point was that 38 years is a LONG TIME in the computer industry.
> Are you still using Wordperfect 5.1 on a 386 DOS machine at 40 MHz? It

No. Mother is using WP 5.0 on a 286.

The 286 seems Y2K clean, by the way. WP50 is mostly so; I notice directory
displays claim we're in the year ":0" currently, but who cares?

Of course, none of those will survive beyond 2107 (a.k.a. "death of DOS").

MfG Kai

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 07 2000 - 21:00:08 EST