Re: Sparc-32 SS-10 SMP spin_lock hang..

From: Robert Dinse (nanook@eskimo.com)
Date: Sun Jan 09 2000 - 01:32:34 EST


     I posted this spin_lock hang on an SS-10 earlier but apparently
according to Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au> ksymoops wasn't getting all of
the fields. Here it is again with a new and improved version of ksymoops:

spin_lock_irqsave(f55cc66c) CPU #0 stuck at f00c3f10, owner PC(f694b694):CPU(0)
spin_lock(f014b9ac) CPU #1 stuck at f002e3d8, owner PC(f002e3d8):CPU(0)
spin_lock(f014b9ac) CPU #2 stuck at f002e3d8, owner PC(f002e3d8):CPU(0)

>>PC; f00c3f10 <rpc_clnt_sigunmask+30/94> <=====
>>PC; f694b694 <END_OF_CODE+678e330/????> <=====
Trace; f55cc66c <END_OF_CODE+540f308/????>
>>PC; f002e3d8 <patchme_store_new_current+9c/338> <=====
>>PC; f002e3d8 <patchme_store_new_current+9c/338> <=====
Trace; f014b9ac <kernel_flag+0/8>
>>PC; f002e3d8 <patchme_store_new_current+9c/338> <=====
>>PC; f002e3d8 <patchme_store_new_current+9c/338> <=====
Trace; f014b9ac <kernel_flag+0/8>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 15 2000 - 21:00:13 EST