Re: time_t size: The year 2038 bug?

From: Jesse Pollard (pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil)
Date: Mon Jan 10 2000 - 08:39:51 EST


>Jesse Pollard <pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil> writes:
>> And even then it is limited to 64 bits on a 64 bit system (unless the
>> compiler is non-standard - ie "long long" type of thing).
>
>long long is in ISO/ANSI C99.

yes it is. but the number of bits is not. On a 32 bit system "long long" is
64 bits. On a 64bit system it is 128. And if you need more bits that
that you are out of luck. "long long" is imprecise, I'd prefer a construct
like "int var: 64". This way I know exactly how many bits are available.
If I need 128 bits for something (or even 4096) then I can define them. Or
is there going to be a "long long long long" for 128 bits, and "long long
long long long long .... long" to reach 4096?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesse I Pollard, II
Email: pollard@navo.hpc.mil

Any opinions expressed are solely my own.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 15 2000 - 21:00:16 EST