Re: February 30th 2000

From: Michael H. Warfield (mhw@wittsend.com)
Date: Thu Jan 13 2000 - 12:29:00 EST

Next message: Kanoj Sarcar: "Re: [RFC] 2.3.39 zone balancing"
Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [RFC] 2.3.39 zone balancing"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: February 30th 2000"
Next in thread: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH: "Re: February 30th 2000"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 10:14:26PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote:

> The funny thing being: 365+1/4-3/400 is seriously worse approximation than
> plain and beautiful 365+1/4-1/128. Somebody didn't grok binary...

Try teaching THAT to third graders... :-)

Mike

-- 
 Michael H. Warfield    |  (770) 985-6132   |  mhw@WittsEnd.com
  (The Mad Wizard)      |  (770) 331-2437   |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
  NIC whois:  MHW9      |  An optimist believes we live in the best of all
 PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471    |  possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Kanoj Sarcar: "Re: [RFC] 2.3.39 zone balancing"
Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [RFC] 2.3.39 zone balancing"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: February 30th 2000"
Next in thread: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH: "Re: February 30th 2000"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 15 2000 - 21:00:23 EST