Re: [idea] request_module(const char *fmt, ...);

From: Tigran Aivazian (tigran@sco.COM)
Date: Fri Jan 14 2000 - 02:42:57 EST

Next message: tytso@valinux.com: "Re: timer_bh robusteness fix against potential deadlocks"
Previous message: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH: "Re: [svlug] February 30th 2000"
In reply to: Horst von Brand: "Re: [idea] request_module(const char *fmt, ...);"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: [idea] request_module(const char *fmt, ...);"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Horst von Brand wrote:
> I'm still convinced that KMOD is enough of an interface change for modules
> to warrant binary incompatibility.

No, the binary compatibility is totally intact, of course. Why do you
think otherwise?

Regards,
Tigran.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: tytso@valinux.com: "Re: timer_bh robusteness fix against potential deadlocks"
Previous message: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH: "Re: [svlug] February 30th 2000"
In reply to: Horst von Brand: "Re: [idea] request_module(const char *fmt, ...);"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: [idea] request_module(const char *fmt, ...);"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 15 2000 - 21:00:23 EST