> I just noticed your patch but why do you use vmalloc() above just 1 page
> and not the kmalloc()'s limit of 128K? Surely below 128K kmalloc() is
> faster than vmalloc()? (I know ipc_alloc() does the same but why?).
128K kmallocs often fail. Probably something like a 32K kmalloc limit
with vmalloc if the kmalloc fails or >32K ?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 23 2000 - 21:00:17 EST