alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk said:
> In Linux. The b/w/d is the PCI specification "byte word doubleword"
> sequence
Then it's not too late. Too late for 2.4, perhaps, but not too late. It could
still be fixed in 2.5.
> How about fixing the 2.3.x bugs and getting 2.4 out before that ?
I can see how that could be considered more appropriate. The only reason I
brought it up at this time was because of the bug that Francois-Rene pointed
out, which was presumably caused by the misnaming of the macros.
-- dwmw2- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 31 2000 - 21:00:12 EST