Re: Auto-Adaptive scheduler - Final chapter ( the numbers ) ...

From: Horst von Brand (vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl)
Date: Thu Jan 27 2000 - 20:25:46 EST

Next message: Horst von Brand: "Re: Preventing gcc from aligning stack???"
Previous message: Pete Clements: "pre2.3.41-4 fails compile (ide.c) i486 w/no pci"
Next in thread: Alex Khripin: "Re: Auto-Adaptive scheduler - Final chapter ( the numbers ) ..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Davide Libenzi" <davidel@maticad.it> said:

[...]

> I still think that speaking about RQ = 2 in analyzing a scheduler is a
> nonsense.

Again: Low load is << 1; normal load is 1 or thereabouts; 2 or more is high
load; 10 or so is already ridiculously overloaded (UP case, for SMP roughly
multiply by #CPUs). This has been shown here with real world data from
higly loaded servers all over the place.

-- Horst von Brand vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl Casilla 9G, Viña del Mar, Chile +56 32 672616

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Horst von Brand: "Re: Preventing gcc from aligning stack???"
Previous message: Pete Clements: "pre2.3.41-4 fails compile (ide.c) i486 w/no pci"
Next in thread: Alex Khripin: "Re: Auto-Adaptive scheduler - Final chapter ( the numbers ) ..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 31 2000 - 21:00:20 EST