Re: elevator-starvation-4 (2.2.14 && 2.3.42) [was Re: 2.3.42 elevator latency] (fwd)

From: Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Date: Wed Feb 09 2000 - 21:39:19 EST


On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

>I started killing the next pointer in my early research until I noticed I
>was breaking lowlevel drivers (ide scsi at least) and so I started

Since I have to break the ->next and queue_head things I'll just drop also
the head_active thing. If there's some subtle reason for wanting to keep
it let me know (but I am fairly certain there aren't except for the
breaking driver thing that I am doing anyway ;).

Andrea

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 15 2000 - 21:00:16 EST