Re: 2.3.42 crashes on boot (Was: [PATCH] devfs v99.11 available)

From: Richard Gooch (rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca)
Date: Thu Feb 10 2000 - 06:19:03 EST


Sergey Kubushin writes:
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Richard Gooch wrote:
>
> > NOTE: the devfs-patch-v99.x patches are maintenance patches for the
> > 2.2.x production kernels. Devfs development is done against recent
> > development kernels. Occasionally, the latest devfs patch for the
> > development kernels may be backported to 2.2.x series, but this
> > happens rarely.
> >
> > This is against 2.2.14. Highlights of this release:
> >
> > - Ported devfs-patch-v99.10 to kernel 2.2.14
> >
> > - Moved /dev/tty0 to /dev/vc/0
>
> It's very nice, but can somebody explain why 2.3.42 with devfs v.154
> crashes on boot ? Initrd strikes back ?

Odd. Please send me (off-list) your /etc/lilo.conf so I can see
exactly what is being passed to the kernel.

> Here is the oops:
>
> === Cut ===
> ksymoops 0.7c on i686 2.3.36. Options used
> -V (specified)
> -K (specified)
> -L (specified)
> -o /lib/modules/kernel/2.3.42/ (specified)
> -m /boot/System.map-2.3.42 (specified)
>
> No modules in ksyms, skipping objects
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000038
> c0149ba1
> *pde = 00104001
> Oops: 0000
> CPU: 0
> EIP: 0010:[<c0149ba1>]
> Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386
> EFLAGS: 00010246
> eax: 00000038 ebx: 00000000 ecx: c02839f2 edx: c14fbe54
> esi: 00000018 edi: c14fbe54 ebp: ffffffed esp: c14fbb00
> ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
> Process swapper (pid: 1, stackpage=c14fb000)
> Stack: 00000100 00000000 c14fbb6c c14fbd04 c0283acd c14fbe54 c14fbca8 c02a00e0
> c0277fc8 00000000 00001000 c02839f2 00000000 c14fbb6c 00000000 00000000
> 00000000 00000000 c14fbc4c c14fbe54 c14fbca8 00000000 00000000 00000000
> Call Trace: [<c0110018>] [<c01081cb>] [<c010a010>]
> Code: 39 46 20 74 2a 50 8b 46 20 50 68 c0 9e 21 c0 e8 53 52 fd ff
>
> >>EIP; c0149ba1 <blkdev_open+19/dc> <=====
> Trace; c0110018 <do_int+a8/1b4>
> Trace; c01081cb <init+5f/1e4>
> Trace; c010a010 <kernel_thread+28/38>
> Code; c0149ba1 <blkdev_open+19/dc>
> 00000000 <_EIP>:
> Code; c0149ba1 <blkdev_open+19/dc> <=====
> 0: 39 46 20 cmp %eax,0x20(%esi) <=====
> Code; c0149ba4 <blkdev_open+1c/dc>
> 3: 74 2a je 2f <_EIP+0x2f> c0149bd0 <blkdev_open+48/dc>
> Code; c0149ba6 <blkdev_open+1e/dc>
> 5: 50 push %eax
> Code; c0149ba7 <blkdev_open+1f/dc>
> 6: 8b 46 20 mov 0x20(%esi),%eax
> Code; c0149baa <blkdev_open+22/dc>
> 9: 50 push %eax
> Code; c0149bab <blkdev_open+23/dc>
> a: 68 c0 9e 21 c0 push $0xc0219ec0
> Code; c0149bb0 <blkdev_open+28/dc>
> f: e8 53 52 fd ff call fffd5267 <_EIP+0xfffd5267> c011ee08 <printk+0/1f4>
> === Cut ===

If it crashes during boot (say mounting root), I would have expected
mount_root() to appear in this traceback. Odd that it's not. Can you
start sprinkling printk()'s around to figure out where blkdev_open()
is being called from when this happens?

Also, I'll need details of how you're using initrd (whether you leave
it mounted after switching root and so on).

                                Regards,

                                        Richard....
Old: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 15 2000 - 21:00:17 EST