Re: Scheduled Transfer Protocol on Linux

From: Ray L (rayl@mail.com)
Date: Sat Feb 12 2000 - 12:15:51 EST


On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 04:33:16AM -0800, Karen Shaeffer wrote:
>
> I disagree with several of your assertions--but any further discussion is
> moot. You have the final word.

if you think someone is mistaken on a technical issue, *and* if you have
the real world experience to back up your argument, please do continue the
discussion. just because you got shot down the other day for saying
something silly and offtopic, it does not follow that you will get roasted
for talking about hard drive technology. (well, you still might, but it's
a lot less likely :-)

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Ray Lehtiniemi (rayl@mail.com) (rayl@optitech.com)

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 15 2000 - 21:00:23 EST