Re: [patch-2.3.47pre3] unused tulip params

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Thu Feb 17 2000 - 22:31:27 EST


On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, James Manning wrote:

> tulip.c:151: warning: `max_interrupt_work' defined but not used
> tulip.c:171: warning: `reverse_probe' defined but not used
>
> Are these params to get used later? Or are they on the way out?

They will probably get used later, as I continue to merge
stuff into the Tulip driver. The recent changes were
Step One in a series of changes to make Tulip faster,
better, and much easier to maintain.

        Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:20 EST