> Ok, if the new helper function facility does not imply the breaking of the
> previous interface / procedure (i.e., if the current code still works), I
> don't see any problem then.
Realistically it does mean breaking them a bit.
> exist, of course ... ;), but because the WAN protocols available in
> syncppp are not the only ones in the Linux kernel. Well, I know y'all
> understand my (and Madarasz's) point.
If we break anything it is to make it follow the same API as the others.
This IMHO is a good thing for all
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:29 EST