Re: Improved <linux/lists.h>

From: Borislav Deianov (borislav@lix.polytechnique.fr)
Date: Tue Feb 22 2000 - 08:36:17 EST

Next message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
Previous message: Andris Pavenis: "[PATCH] Re: One more boobytrap needed for 2.2.15pre ?"
Maybe in reply to: Andreas Gruenbacher: "Improved <linux/lists.h>"
Next in thread: Andreas Gruenbacher: "Re: Improved <linux/lists.h>"
Reply: Andreas Gruenbacher: "Re: Improved <linux/lists.h>"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In article <38B242EB.CF20FB40@bestbits.at> you wrote:
> I've had some trouble using the queues defined in <linux/lists.h>.

AFAIK, linux/list.h is the recommended linked list implementation,
consider using that instead.

Regards,
Borislav

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
Previous message: Andris Pavenis: "[PATCH] Re: One more boobytrap needed for 2.2.15pre ?"
Maybe in reply to: Andreas Gruenbacher: "Improved <linux/lists.h>"
Next in thread: Andreas Gruenbacher: "Re: Improved <linux/lists.h>"
Reply: Andreas Gruenbacher: "Re: Improved <linux/lists.h>"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:30 EST