Re: lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 + 2.2.14aa7 fixes crash, but...

From: Ingo Molnar (mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu)
Date: Tue Feb 22 2000 - 14:03:00 EST

Next message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 + 2.2.14aa7 fixes crash, but..."
Previous message: Dean Gaudet: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
In reply to: William Montgomery: "Re: lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 + 2.2.14aa7 fixes crash, but..."
Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 + 2.2.14aa7 fixes crash, but..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, William Montgomery wrote:

> How about 'b_count++; schedule(); b_count--; goto again;' in
> __invalidate_buffers and set_blocksize?

yep. There might be additional bugs.

Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 + 2.2.14aa7 fixes crash, but..."
Previous message: Dean Gaudet: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
In reply to: William Montgomery: "Re: lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 + 2.2.14aa7 fixes crash, but..."
Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 + 2.2.14aa7 fixes crash, but..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:31 EST