Re: accept() improvements for rt signals

From: Julian Anastasov (uli@linux.tu-varna.acad.bg)
Date: Tue Feb 22 2000 - 13:02:38 EST

Next message: Richard Gooch: "Re: [patch-2.3.47] /proc/driver/microcode -> /dev/cpu/microcode"
Previous message: Gerard Roudier: "Re: sym53c8xx syslog messages from 2.2.14"
In reply to: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
Next in thread: Julian Anastasov: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2000 17:38:45 +0200 (EET), Julian Anastasov
> <uli@linux.tu-varna.acad.bg> said:
>
> > Is there a known problem with O_NONBLOCK|O_ASYNC listening
> > sockets (2.2.15pre7 UP) ? I receive unexpected SIGIO after accept()
> > using such listening socket.
>
> I was able to reproduce this on sockets connected from localhost. Can
> you see if running the client and server on separate machines still
> causes the problem?
>
> --Stephen
>

I can't see this problem when the client and the server are on
the same host. When the client and the server are on different hosts the
problem occurs once on each 10 seconds. But I still can't detect why this
happens. I will return with more info next time after some kernel
patching.

Regards

-- Julian Anastasov <uli@linux.tu-varna.acad.bg>

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Richard Gooch: "Re: [patch-2.3.47] /proc/driver/microcode -> /dev/cpu/microcode"
Previous message: Gerard Roudier: "Re: sym53c8xx syslog messages from 2.2.14"
In reply to: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
Next in thread: Julian Anastasov: "Re: accept() improvements for rt signals"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:31 EST