Re: [PATCH] rootfstype boot argument

From: Tigran Aivazian (tigran@ocston.org)
Date: Mon Feb 28 2000 - 03:28:13 EST


actually, I did the rootfstype thing (and /proc/config but different
from Peter's) too, ages ago :)

http://www.ocston.org/~tigran/patches/rootfs-2.3.29-p1.patch

and it is nicer to call it rootfs than rootfstype, because:

a) compatible with SVR4

b) most people are running hacked versions of LILO shipped with major
distributions (Red Hat, SuSE etc) which have a limit of 79 bytes per
command line. One can overcome this limit with my BCP thing but only a
handful of people actually use it.

Regards,
Tigran

On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Guest section DW wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 05:23:36PM -0700, Peter J. Braam wrote:
>
> > boot: linux rootfstype=InterMezzo
>
> Good!
>
> [Four years ago I submitted a patch for the same boot parameter:
> + * Added rootfstype= option: autodetection is unreliable, aeb, 960416
> Mount with autodetection is sometimes unreliable; people who need
> absolutely reliable operation use mount -t. But at boot time the
> kernel just guesses - very un-Unix-like.]
>
> Andries
>
> -----
> 2:34am up 1111 days, 15:23, 11 users, load average: 1.00, 1.00, 1.00
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 21:00:19 EST