Re: [PATCH] Posix timers for 2.3.48

From: Olivier Galibert (galibert@pobox.com)
Date: Mon Feb 28 2000 - 19:29:00 EST

Next message: Ingo Oeser: "/proc does not accept new default_fops?"
Previous message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: Capabilities"
In reply to: Robert de Vries: "[PATCH] Posix timers for 2.3.48"
Next in thread: Robert de Vries: "Re: [PATCH] Posix timers for 2.3.48"
Reply: Robert de Vries: "Re: [PATCH] Posix timers for 2.3.48"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 09:52:55PM +0100, Robert de Vries wrote:
> As a reaction to the question if this should be in the kernel in the first
> place: IMHO, there is no way to emulate these calls in user space by using
> the setitimer() system call. For the following reasons:
[...]

This probably means that setitimer should be implemented using posix
timers, no?

OG.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ingo Oeser: "/proc does not accept new default_fops?"
Previous message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: Capabilities"
In reply to: Robert de Vries: "[PATCH] Posix timers for 2.3.48"
Next in thread: Robert de Vries: "Re: [PATCH] Posix timers for 2.3.48"
Reply: Robert de Vries: "Re: [PATCH] Posix timers for 2.3.48"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 21:00:20 EST