Re: Changes in the sockets: SIGIO handling

From: Stephen C. Tweedie (sct@redhat.com)
Date: Mon Mar 06 2000 - 13:08:13 EST


Hi,

On Sat, 4 Mar 2000 19:31:12 +0300 (MSK), kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru said:

> If you want invalidation event, its only place is inside VFS.
> sock_close() is called when socket is _really_ closed, rather than
> when fd is invalidated. It is too late to do something with
> fasync_list at this point, fd is already invalid and its place
> is busy with another innocent decriptor.

Right --- POLLNVAL being the correct signal?

--Stephen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 21:00:20 EST