Khimenko Victor wrote:
> P.P.P.S. Once again: why "big boys" are so silent on issue ? I know,
> it's not very sexy but it SHOULD be done one way or another before 2.4
> is out. Otherwise you just can not do reliable ftpwho and on LOTS of
> sites such command is usefull. It's easy to say that ftpd should not
> use setproctitle(3) for this but then if it's all is not important
> then why procfs was invented in first place ???
If ftpwho is the only reason, then forget it. ftpwho can be implemented
without looking at the cmdline field.
-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 21:00:22 EST