Re: [patch-2.3.50-pre2] bdget() needs to be exported

From: Mike Galbraith (mikeg@weiden.de)
Date: Tue Mar 07 2000 - 10:20:40 EST

Next message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: Help in DSM design"
Previous message: Khimenko Victor: "Re: If something is not stated in POSIX we should not bother even if 90%+ of Linux system out there using it ??"
In reply to: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: [patch-2.3.50-pre2] bdget() needs to be exported"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:

> On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > Instead of exporting bdget(), I opted to keep the ramdisk's private
> > problem internal to that driver as in patch below. Thoughts?
>
> The main thought is that the driver is broken at the moment, irrespective
> of your latest change. Namely:

Hmm.. you're right, seems it's busted wrt protection again. Digging.

-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: Help in DSM design"
Previous message: Khimenko Victor: "Re: If something is not stated in POSIX we should not bother even if 90%+ of Linux system out there using it ??"
In reply to: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: [patch-2.3.50-pre2] bdget() needs to be exported"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 21:00:22 EST