Re: Changes in the sockets: SIGIO handling

From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Date: Wed Mar 08 2000 - 12:50:46 EST


Hello!

> These aren't correct. (Correct for the sentence you quoted, but not its
> context). I should have said: If you've got a partial read's worth of
> data pending, you should return immediately -- without sleeping.

Reduction of work is the only sense of these options. 8)

> ?? I don't understand. This affects read() somehow?

write() also needs signals and has the same problem.

> :-) Fair enough; I hope you can see that there is a way to reduce the
> over-signalling without breaking applications.

? I do not understand you. There are still no applications to break,
SVR4 does not oversignal. It was you who propose to promote status of
oversignaling from a linux bug to required feature.

Alexey

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 15 2000 - 21:00:14 EST