Re: PNP design philosophy?

From: Oliver Xymoron (oxymoron@waste.org)
Date: Fri Mar 10 2000 - 00:10:38 EST


On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> No, it really isn't. The i386 is a *very* different architecture than
> the 8086, i186, or i286. The name IA-32 is a very recent construct.

The whole 'i' naming is new too, though most people were never aware of
it. The parts used to be known as 8086, 8088, 80286, 80386, 80486. The
'i' stuff appeared when they tried to sue a clone maker (AMD) for calling
a part 486 and were informed by a judge that they couldn't trademark a
number. Then they redid all their docs and pretended the 80x86 numbers
never existed.

I don't remember them ever calling a part i286 or i186, but they may have
relabeled them as well..

--
 "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.." 

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 15 2000 - 21:00:17 EST