Re: PATCH: /proc/irq/ fix

From: Ingo Molnar (mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu)
Date: Fri Mar 10 2000 - 16:41:04 EST


On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Pavel Machek wrote:

> > /proc/interrupts is pretty long on bigger IO-APIC systems if all IRQ
> > sources are listed. I'm not sure wether we want this.
>
> It might alert people that non-listed interrupts are doing something
> strange. And it should not be much bigger than it is now -- there
> should not be much "active but currently not used" interrupts.

64 on my box.

        Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 15 2000 - 21:00:18 EST