Re: patch: reiserfs for 2.3.49

From: Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Date: Mon Mar 13 2000 - 17:12:21 EST


On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
>
> Can you run _all_ of the above at the same time on a a large machine
> will gobs and ram and multiple processors? With the file
> creation/deletion -- are you doing this to the same directories from
> multiple threads at once?

Now, now, don't be too harsh on the resierfs guys.

Do we suddenly expect code to be bug-free before inclusion into the
kernel?

For rather obvious PR reasons I'd love to say "yes, we have a journalling
filesystem these days" as part of the 2.4.x release stuff, so it does fall
under the "drivers so cool that they might make it into 2.4.x". I don't
think I want to see the read_inode() changes, though, that's just too
ugly. I may like the PR angle of reiserfs, but that doesn't mean that I'd
forget about things like these completely.

But it looks to me as if the read_inode thing plus a few cleanups in
raiserfs to take into account that the VFS layer does more these days
would certainly make it a candidate for inclusion. Maybe not 2.4.0, but
during 2.4.x. Don't be so down on the guys, there are people who really
like actively using raiserfs..

                Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 15 2000 - 21:00:27 EST