On 14 Mar 2000 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> you can abuse any but the most anal schedulers if you are allowed to run
> multiple processes/threads. On systems where this could be a problem
> strict resource (process) limits and CPU time accounting and monitoring
> should be used.
<plug>
Or you can use Fairsched. Briefly: processes are assigned to nodes,
each node has a weight. Nodes are guaranteed their "fair share" of the
CPU. Each node uses the standard scheduler internally. Therefore, no
matter how antisocial your processes are, you can only hurt your own
node.
http://people.cornell.edu/pages/bdd2/fairsched/
</plug>
Regards,
Borislav
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 15 2000 - 21:00:28 EST