Re: [PATCH] improved ptrace syscall tracing (backward compatible)

From: Jeff Dike (jdike@karaya.com)
Date: Tue Mar 14 2000 - 13:15:05 EST

Next message: Donald Becker: "Re: 2.3.51 tulip broken"
Previous message: Saxena, Deepak: "i2o_block (WAS: Re: Linux-2.3.51, and the pre-2.4 series..)"
In reply to: Mike Coleman: "[PATCH] improved ptrace syscall tracing (backward compatible)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> (SUBTERFUGUE requires this, and strace would benefit, too, as it
> currently has to guess, AFAIK.)

The user-mode port would benefit from this, as well.

Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Donald Becker: "Re: 2.3.51 tulip broken"
Previous message: Saxena, Deepak: "i2o_block (WAS: Re: Linux-2.3.51, and the pre-2.4 series..)"
In reply to: Mike Coleman: "[PATCH] improved ptrace syscall tracing (backward compatible)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 15 2000 - 21:00:29 EST