Den 13-Mar-00 22:16:31 skrev James Sutherland fĝlgende om "Re: Overcomittable memory (Was: Linux 2.2.15pre12)":
> If you REALLY want to allow for the worst case: Each process has an
> address space of 3 Gb (+1Gb kernel). Your method would require, for a
> sytem with a hard limit of 1024 processes, a minimum of 3Tb swap+RAM. You
> can try this if you want, but I don't think many people will follow this.
Somewhere along the line you misunderstood something fundamental. What
it is that makes you conclude that you cannot have a system with no
overcomitment of memory and, say, 64 MiB RAM + swap combined and a hard
limit of 4096 processes?
Regards,
/ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻTŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ\
| Rask Ingemann Lambertsen | E-mail: mailto:rask@kampsax.dtu.dk |
| Please do NOT Cc: to me or the | WWW: http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c948374/ |
| mailing list. I am on the list.| "ThrustMe" on XPilot, ARCnet and IRC |
| To err is human, but to really mess things up you need a computer. |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 23 2000 - 21:00:17 EST