Nope........
If you do not have IDE support then "ide-scsi" KABOOM!!
Try it........The converse is true........
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Eric Youngdale wrote:
> [Eric.1] Try the enclosed patch. It corrects two issues, actually - it
> [Eric.1] fixes the one whereby the dependency isn't right for ide-scsi,and
>
> [AV] Ehh... Isn't the ide-scsi question asked before the SCSI question?
>
> [Eric.2] Yes and no. If you are using menuconfig or xconfig then it
> [Eric.2] isn't a huge problem as you are not required to navigate the thing
> [Eric.2] in any particular order. If you are running the vanilla configure
> [Eric.2] script then yes, you are right.
>
> Would this be solved in an acceptable way by moving the ide-scsi question
> from the IDE Config.in to the SCSI Config.in?
> [after all, it is ide-SCSI :-) ]
>
> Greetings,
> Arjan van de Ven
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> "If you continue running Windows, your system may become unstable."
> - Windows 95 BSOD
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
Andre Hedrick
The Linux ATA/IDE guy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 23 2000 - 21:00:23 EST