Re: SHM -isn't- broken, something else is

From: Blu3Viper (david@killerlabs.com)
Date: Tue Mar 21 2000 - 05:18:41 EST


I'll do that first thing in the morning, right now I need a couple hours of
shuteye.

Thankyou,
-d

On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Steve Dodd wrote:

> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 08:16:15 +0000
> From: Steve Dodd <steved@loth.demon.co.uk>
> To: david <david@killerlabs.com>
> Cc: Christoph Rohland <hans-christoph.rohland@sap.com>,
> linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
> Subject: Re: SHM -isn't- broken, something else is
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 05:36:26PM -0800, david wrote:
>
> > The problem is that processes get stuck in D state and unfortunately I can't
> > see what they are waiting on.
>
> (Sorry, I've not looked at your mail in detail, but...) If the IKD patches
> apply cleanly, you could use the semaphore deadlock detection to create an
> oops after ~20secs and get a backtrace. I think Andrea uploads them to
> ftp.*.kernel.org these days.
>
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 23 2000 - 21:00:32 EST