Den 19-Mar-00 19:47:15 skrev James Sutherland fĝlgende om "Re: Overcomittable memory":
> Or just commit based on the memory which is really being used by the
> process, which is nice and simple, and hasn't caused any problems I
> know of yet.
And is exactly what you don't mean by the word commit.
> It works - why change it?
Because it _doesn't_ work. It breaks programs which follow the rules.
Regards,
/ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻTŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ\
| Rask Ingemann Lambertsen | E-mail: mailto:rask@kampsax.dtu.dk |
| Please do NOT Cc: to me or the | WWW: http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c948374/ |
| mailing list. I am on the list.| "ThrustMe" on XPilot, ARCnet and IRC |
| Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it still exists. |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 23 2000 - 21:00:33 EST