Re: Endless overcommit memory thread.

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@transmeta.com)
Date: Fri Mar 24 2000 - 20:47:38 EST


Followup to: <38DC06D2.5D6A9CD@sgi.com>
By author: Linda Walsh <law@sgi.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> I think there should be a 2nd system call with semantics like
> 'vfork' or IRIX's sproc that explicitly allows data segment sharing
> so only stack space needs to be allocated for the fork to work.
> Current fork -- I lean toward not overcommitting -- it seems more
> proper.
>

You mean like vfork()? Or clone()?

        -hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 31 2000 - 21:00:14 EST