Re: [RFC] One solution for the oom/overcommit debate

• Next message: David Whysong: "Re: Virtual vs. physical swap & shared memory forks (clone)"
• Previous message: Guest section DW: "Re: Linux makes 30G WD disk confused about its identity"
• Next in thread: Helge Hafting: "[RFC] One solution for the oom/overcommit debate"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Steffen Ullrich <coyote.frank@gmx.net> said:

> A few years ago (after getting OOM problems on Digital UNIX where it
> killed the inetd process and locked me out remotly) I had a similar idea
> (but it's sti ll only an idea, nothing implemented):

Rik _has_ implemented something, and many have tried it...

-- 
Horst von Brand                             vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl
Casilla 9G, Viņa del Mar, Chile                               +56 32 672616
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: David Whysong: "Re: Virtual vs. physical swap & shared memory forks (clone)"
• Previous message: Guest section DW: "Re: Linux makes 30G WD disk confused about its identity"
• Next in thread: Helge Hafting: "[RFC] One solution for the oom/overcommit debate"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 31 2000 - 21:00:16 EST