Re: Virtual vs. physical swap & shared memory forks (clone)

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Sat Mar 25 2000 - 20:38:36 EST


On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, Linda Walsh wrote:

> The idea is *predictability*. Guarantees of behavior.
> Your user deamon is fine for many cases, but it's execution is
> not deterministic.

Please back up your assertions with code. If you can implement
a non-overcommit option which doesn't put overhead in the normal
kernel, I'm sure people will use it.

The IRIX vswap argument isn't a really valid one either.
Almost all IRIX admins I've talked to had their vswap at
either zero or infinity because otherwise behaviour would
be too difficult to predict ... exactly the opposite of
what you are saying here.

regards,

Rik

--
The Internet is not a network of computers. It is a network
of people. That is its real strength.

Wanna talk about the kernel? irc.openprojects.net / #kernelnewbies http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 31 2000 - 21:00:16 EST