Re: Location of shmfs; devfs automagics

• Next message: Agus Budy Wuysang: "Re: Video CD under Linux"
• Previous message: Dragan Stancevic: "Re: [PATCH] eepro100.c"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

orc@pell.portland.or.us (david parsons) writes:
> [2: If I'm understanding you and you're promoting
> a generic memoryfs class: Yum! Can I beta-test it?]

Yes, we should definitely do that. There are many ideas of memoryfses
and the one single point which makes them difficult and ugly is the
directory handling.

If we had a generic implementation, we would prevent a lot of code
duplication and a lot of badly designed in memory fs's (like the
directory handling of shm fs ;-/)

Greetings
                Christoph

-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Agus Budy Wuysang: "Re: Video CD under Linux"
• Previous message: Dragan Stancevic: "Re: [PATCH] eepro100.c"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 31 2000 - 21:00:28 EST