Re: eepro100.c

From: Dragan Stancevic (visitor@valinux.com)
Date: Fri Mar 31 2000 - 15:07:12 EST


On Fri, Mar 31, 2000, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
; > 82557, 82558, 82559 all share the same PCI Device ID so they all appear
; > in the driver and in the proc file system as 82557 with this patch we
; > have all the information centralized so users are less confused and
; > you don't need to carry specs with you or open the box to figure out
; > which chip does your NIC carry, right now the driver doesn't take any
; > advantage of that information, but since each chip has slightly different
; > personality or errata I would like to take advantage of that information
; > in the driver, later on.
;
; You dont need it in the driver for anything you are doing right now you can
; use lspci. I've had some discussion with intel about fixing the licensing
; for the eepro100 driver they released so that we can merge the two (they
; have support for more boards, ucode for interrupt mitigation, errata workarounds
; and portability and locking flaws.
;
; I have a positive answer I dont quite understand 8) from the Intel lawyers

That's where I was heading but I was not aware that intel is reconsidering
their license... Did they give you any time frames to when the intel driver
might be release under a more compatible license?

Thanks

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 31 2000 - 21:00:29 EST