Re: why does mlockall appear to make memcpy slower ?

From: Michael Bacarella (mbac@nyct.net)
Date: Mon Apr 03 2000 - 10:31:12 EST


> >> Average msecs per MB 4.914158; Average copy rate: 0.000005 msecs/byte
> >>
> >> if run without root permission (i.e. mlockall() fails), and
> >>
> >> Average msecs per MB 7.417227; Average copy rate: 0.000007 msecs/byte
> >>
> >> if run with root permission.
> >>
> >> Is there a simple explanation ?
> >
> >mlockall() is a privileged call. Performance could improve if all pages
> >are locked. The non-root version doesn't perform as well because
> >mlockall() fails, subjecting the pages to the system's evil memory
> >management schemes (paging/etc).
> >
> >I'm almost positive you know this though, so your question seems strange.
>
> Look at what I wrote again. It runs *slower* when run as root, and
> faster when not. That is, mlockall() causes it run slower.

I grok "Average msecs per MB 7.417227; Average copy rate: 0.000007
msecs/bytes if run with root permission." as meaning "If I run with root
permissions, I get 7.4xx MB/sec"

-MB

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 07 2000 - 21:00:10 EST