Re: why does mlockall appear to make memcpy slower ?

From: Manfred Spraul (manfreds@colorfullife.com)
Date: Mon Apr 03 2000 - 14:26:14 EST

Next message: Christoph Rohland: "Re: DOSEMU Gets "cannot load shm filesystem" error on 2.3.99"
Previous message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: why does mlockall appear to make memcpy slower ?"
Maybe in reply to: Paul Barton-Davis: "why does mlockall appear to make memcpy slower ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Forget my post, I'm blind:
make_pages_present() forces all pages into memory.

Sorry,
Manfred

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Christoph Rohland: "Re: DOSEMU Gets "cannot load shm filesystem" error on 2.3.99"
Previous message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: why does mlockall appear to make memcpy slower ?"
Maybe in reply to: Paul Barton-Davis: "why does mlockall appear to make memcpy slower ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 07 2000 - 21:00:10 EST