Re: DOSEMU Gets "cannot load shm filesystem" error on 2.3.99

From: Christoph Rohland (hans-christoph.rohland@sap.com)
Date: Mon Apr 03 2000 - 14:21:57 EST

Next message: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "[PATCH] - was: Re: Cylinder limits ..."
Previous message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: why does mlockall appear to make memcpy slower ?"
Next in thread: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: DOSEMU Gets "cannot load shm filesystem" error on 2.3.99"
Reply: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: DOSEMU Gets "cannot load shm filesystem" error on 2.3.99"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@timpanogas.com> writes:

> DOSEMU on 2.3.99 gets a "cannot load shm filesystem" error on 2.3.99
> then hard locks
> the machine.

"cannot load shm filesystem" means probably a kernel message "shm
filesystem not mounted". So please mount the shm fs somewhere.

Greetings
Christoph

--

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "[PATCH] - was: Re: Cylinder limits ..."
Previous message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: why does mlockall appear to make memcpy slower ?"
Next in thread: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: DOSEMU Gets "cannot load shm filesystem" error on 2.3.99"
Reply: Jeff V. Merkey: "Re: DOSEMU Gets "cannot load shm filesystem" error on 2.3.99"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 07 2000 - 21:00:10 EST