Re: Music CD's

From: Douglas Kilpatrick (dougk@tislabs.com)
Date: Tue Apr 04 2000 - 18:29:09 EST

Next message: Graham Stoney: "Re: [PATCH] fixes for kernel with no procfs."
Previous message: Heinz Mauelshagen: "**** LVM 0.8final patch vs. 2.3.99-pre3 ***"
In reply to: David Elliott: "Re: Music CD's"
Next in thread: DeRobertis: "Re: Music CD's"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, David Elliott wrote:

> > Just because "Foo doesn't belong in the kernel" doesn't mean "Foo doesn't
> > belong in the global namespace."
> >
> > Doug "thinks '
> > mount -t user -o cdparanoiafs /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom
> > for i in /mnt/cdrom/*.wav
> > do
> > bladeenc $i ~/foo_$i.mp3
> > done
> > ' is really cool" Kilpatrick

> Errr.. that is until a CD has an unrecoverrable error (scratch) and you don't
> see it because you can't see the output from cdparanoia!

*shrug*. syslog?

> I still think that this is a bad idea. It's a good an interesting hack, but
> I have to ask: What is the point???

Namespace unification. Doing things "The Unix/Plan9 way". Interface
consistency.

Doug

-- dougk@tislabs.com dkilpatr@nai.com

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Graham Stoney: "Re: [PATCH] fixes for kernel with no procfs."
Previous message: Heinz Mauelshagen: "**** LVM 0.8final patch vs. 2.3.99-pre3 ***"
In reply to: David Elliott: "Re: Music CD's"
Next in thread: DeRobertis: "Re: Music CD's"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 07 2000 - 21:00:13 EST