On 4 Apr 2000, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> We really do need a set of common routines for input data like this.
> Right now the various /proc devices which accept input data are all
> over the place, and duplicate effort. The sysctl code has the right
> idea -- special handlers to accept certain input data, and
> standardized formats for both input and output -- except that the rest
> of the sysctl code is a mess as far as I can tell.
>
> sysctl is a lot like SNMP MIBs. It might be a good idea to formalize
> this relationship.
Not likely. Names should be strings, damnit. Notice that *BSD folks seem
to be moving to sysctlbyname(), which takes a _name_, not an array of
magic constants as a sysctl ID. And right they are - it's UNIX, not
OS/360, after all.
-- "ASCII is tough" -- Programmer Barbie- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 07 2000 - 21:00:16 EST