RE: Makefile cleanups

From: Jonathan Walther (krooger@debian.org)
Date: Thu Apr 06 2000 - 05:30:25 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

The ncurses detection was horribly ugly and broke on
a) systems where libncurses was installed in /usr/local/lib
b) systems where it was named libcurses instead of libncurses

As for what was wrong with the bash detection, go back and read
the patch. Since WHEN do we require bash to be in /bin?

If you are encouraging people to do things the way way lxdialog did it,
I can only say "God have mercy on our souls".

On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Jones D (ISaCS) wrote:
> > This patch applies against 2.3.99-pre3; fixes the detection of bash
> > and libncurses,
>
> What was wrong with it?
> Yesterday someone submitted a patch that had a shell script that looked
> for libgpm, and was advised to abandon the script, and do it the way we
> look for ncurses.
>
> Keeping everything in the Makefile seems a lot cleaner than moving to
> seperate unnecessary shell scripts.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBOOxnQsK9HT/YfGeBAQFQpAP8CowbeQYw/DULjSVmadNbVAt+YWjEcTuG
+2385P/1ZQ2pBbUrhxNj87hEgxp89fTK94CD7yP6elK6mGZ44gkLYhl/L8iVNQDM
yO/LThhgs00ZHwD+U3dn5p53Ge0aAY4jLZekT2V7c0i5IHVK8O30hHsN4+y/CTVb
j1ldCBwpAkI=
=KPrF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 07 2000 - 21:00:16 EST