Re: new (non-shmfs) Oops in pre4-4. procfs actually.

From: Benjamin Redelings (bredelin@ucla.edu)
Date: Fri Apr 07 2000 - 12:32:21 EST

Next message: Scott Henry: "2.3.99-pre3 oops in NFS client write"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: new (non-shmfs) Oops in pre4-4. procfs actually."
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: new (non-shmfs) Oops in pre4-4. procfs actually."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Revert changes in kernel/exec.c - move task_lock() back to the place where
> it used to be.
Thanks!
I assume you mean exit.c?
-BenRI

-- "For nature does not give virtue, It is an art to become good." - Seneca Benjamin Redelings I <>< http://www.bol.ucla.edu/~bredelin

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Scott Henry: "2.3.99-pre3 oops in NFS client write"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: new (non-shmfs) Oops in pre4-4. procfs actually."
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: new (non-shmfs) Oops in pre4-4. procfs actually."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 07 2000 - 21:00:18 EST