Re: >64MB RAM problems, why?

From: david parsons (orc@pell.portland.or.us)
Date: Sat Apr 08 2000 - 15:40:55 EST


In article <linux.kernel.E12dhrY-0001aS-00@the-village.bc.nu>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

>> I've also heard that 2.4 solves this problems. How hard would it be to
>> "back-port" the solution to 2.2?
>
>Too risky, wont happen near future

    ... because it's already been done.

                  ____
    david parsons \bi/ It's not modular enough, though :-(
                   \/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:11 EST