Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs

From: allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
Date: Mon Apr 10 2000 - 18:15:52 EST

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: zap_page_range(): TLB flush race"
Previous message: Ronald Cole: "absence of ipmasq helper module for "netmeeting" apps?"
In reply to: Kai Henningsen: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Next in thread: Ed Carp: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 10 Apr, Kai Henningsen wrote:
+-----
| Before we spend time impproving the speed of /proc, let's first have a
| demonstration of where, exactly, there are speed problems.
+--->8

Before we spend time improving the speed of /proc, let's first decide
if we are going to rewrite it as per recent discussions.

-- brandon s. allbery os/2,linux,solaris,perl allbery@kf8nh.apk.net system administrator kthkrb,heimdal,gnome,rt allbery@ece.cmu.edu carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering kf8nh We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: zap_page_range(): TLB flush race"
Previous message: Ronald Cole: "absence of ipmasq helper module for "netmeeting" apps?"
In reply to: Kai Henningsen: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Next in thread: Ed Carp: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:15 EST