Re: An alternative way of populating /proc

From: Matthew Kirkwood (weejock@ferret.lmh.ox.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Apr 11 2000 - 12:11:08 EST


On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Matt Aubury wrote:

> create_proc_entries(NULL,
> "test:{bar:{x:%d,y:%d,z:%d},foo:%f}",
> &x, &y, &z, foo_fun);

Thinking further about it, could the %'s become something
else? It'd be nice to be able to make these strings with
sprintf().

Matthew.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:16 EST