Re: An alternative way of populating /proc

From: Richard Gooch (rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca)
Date: Tue Apr 11 2000 - 13:24:41 EST


Matthew Kirkwood writes:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Matt Aubury wrote:
>
> > create_proc_entries(NULL,
> > "test:{bar:{x:%d,y:%d,z:%d},foo:%f}",
> > &x, &y, &z, foo_fun);
>
> Thinking further about it, could the %'s become something
> else? It'd be nice to be able to make these strings with
> sprintf().

No problem. Use "%%".

                                Regards,

                                        Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:16 EST