Re: An alternative way of populating /proc

From: Bill Wendling (wendling@ganymede.isdn.uiuc.edu)
Date: Tue Apr 11 2000 - 15:59:33 EST


Also sprach Jan-Simon Pendry:
} > > > create_proc_entries(NULL,
} > > > "test:{bar:{x:%d,y:%d,z:%d},foo:%f}",
} > > > &x, &y, &z, foo_fun);
} > >
} > > Thinking further about it, could the %'s become something
} > > else? It'd be nice to be able to make these strings with
} > > sprintf().
} >
} > No problem. Use "%%".
}
} i think the suggestion is that %% is ugly, and more important, prone
} to simply errors - the original doesn't need to use %. it could
} use something else, like $, @, & etc.
}
But % is so much like C that it's natural of how to think about it when
coding.

-- 
|| Bill Wendling			wendling@ganymede.isdn.uiuc.edu

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:16 EST